The Impact of Social Factors on Endometriosis Diagnostic Delay 

Introduction 

Endometriosis is a chronic condition where tissue like the lining of the uterus grows outside of the uterus. About 1 in 10 women have endometriosis. This tissue growth can cause severe pain and sometimes infertility. Even though endometriosis is common, it typically takes around 8 years to get diagnosed. The delay in diagnosis is mainly due to social factors, not medical reasons. 

Cultural beliefs and attitudes play a big role in the diagnostic delay. Many people think severe menstrual pain is normal, so they dismiss the symptoms as typical period cramps. This prevents women from getting medical help early on. There is also stigma around discussing menstrual health, which discourages open conversations. Without support, women delay seeking a diagnosis. 

Sometimes, doctors downplay or dismiss women’s symptoms related to their periods. This “medical gaslighting” makes women doubt how severe their pain really is, prolonging their suffering before getting properly diagnosed. There are also gender biases in medicine where women’s pain is taken less seriously than men’s. 

Outdated stereotypes, like endometriosis being called a “career woman’s disease,” affect how the condition is perceived and treated, especially for women who don’t fit that stereotype. Women of color and those from lower-income backgrounds face even longer delays getting diagnosed due to racial and socioeconomic disparities. 

To reduce diagnostic delays for endometriosis, we need to address these social factors. This includes promoting open discussion of menstrual health, better education for patients and healthcare providers, and supportive workplace policies. These steps are essential for improving the diagnosis and management of this common condition. In this white paper, we will discuss these social factors and how MARCH Health can help address them. 

1. Normalization of Menstrual Pain 

The normalization of menstrual pain is a significant social factor that contributes to the diagnostic delay of endometriosis. This dangerous normalization stems from multiple societal influences: 

1.1. Generational Perpetuation 

Many women believe that having severe menstrual pain is normal because their mothers, grandmothers, and other female relatives also experienced similar levels of pain during their periods. These women often downplayed their own menstrual experiences, suggesting that excruciating period pain is “just the way it is” for women. By accepting and normalizing severe menstrual pain as a natural part of womanhood, this belief gets passed down from one generation to the next.  

• A survey found that 40% of women with endometriosis reported that their symptoms were dismissed as “normal” by family members, perpetuating the cycle of normalization.  

As a result, many women tolerate and do not report their symptoms to healthcare providers, thinking that their level of pain is typical and not a cause for concern or medical intervention. This cycle of normalization perpetuates the idea that agonizing menstrual cramps are unavoidable for women. 

1.2. Lack of Comprehensive Education 

Many women do not know much about endometriosis and its symptoms. The people around them also lack this knowledge. Because of this lack of information, women believe that having very painful periods is normal. They think they are just “unlucky” or that their level of pain is typical for women. They do not realize that their severe menstrual pain could be a sign of a medical problem. Since they see the pain as normal, they do not seek medical help or talk about their symptoms. These delays getting a proper diagnosis and treatment. 

• According to a study, only 50% of women were aware of endometriosis before being diagnosed. 

1.3. Media Portrayal and Advertising 

Ads for menstrual products and how periods are shown in TV, movies, and other media make period pain seem like it’s not a big deal. They make it look like painful cramps are just a minor inconvenience that all women must deal with, not a possible medical problem. 

The media and advertising send the message that suffering through painful periods is just something normal that women are expected to endure. This idea that menstrual pain is no big deal is deeply ingrained in society. 

1.4. Dismissive Attitudes in Healthcare 

Doctors and nurses sometimes dismiss women’s reports of painful periods as just normal. This reflects the common cultural belief that severe menstrual pain is not a big deal. Women often encounter doctors who downplay their pain or suggest it is just caused by stress or emotions, not a physical issue. This makes women start to doubt if their level of pain is abnormal or needs medical treatment.  

• The Endometriosis UK survey found that 51% of those later diagnosed with endometriosis had their symptoms normalized by their GP initially. Additionally, 63% were just recommended over-the-counter painkillers when discussing their symptoms. 

The dismissive attitude from healthcare providers reinforces the belief that excruciating cramps are normal for women. When doctors brush off their symptoms, women feel helpless, start doubting themselves, and lose trust in getting help from the healthcare system. This discourages them from continuing to seek a proper diagnosis. 

2. Stigma and Lack of Open Dialogue 

Despite menstruation being a natural and vital biological process, there remains a pervasive stigma and discomfort surrounding open discussions about menstrual health. This stigma creates significant barriers for women seeking timely diagnosis and treatment for conditions like endometriosis. 

2.1. Menstruation as Taboo 

The cultural taboo surrounding menstruation significantly impacts the timely diagnosis of endometriosis. In the United States, this taboo forces individuals to conceal their symptoms, a phenomenon described as “performing wellness.” This involves women acting as though they are healthy to avoid public disclosure of their limitations, thus delaying the pursuit of medical help. The stigma around discussing menstrual health issues further discourages open communication and contributes to prolonged suffering  

2.2. Lack of Dialogue in Personal Spheres 

In many cultures, menstrual issues are considered too personal or inappropriate to discuss openly within families and social circles. This cultural silence creates an environment where women feel embarrassed or ashamed to talk about their menstrual health, including severe symptoms like those caused by endometriosis. This lack of dialogue perpetuates the stigma surrounding menstruation and reinforces the notion that menstrual problems should be endured quietly and without complaint. 

• This cultural silence, cited by 48% of women in a survey, creates an environment where women feel embarrassed to talk about their menstrual health, including severe symptoms like those caused by endometriosis. 

 The absence of open discussions about menstrual health deprives women of valuable support networks. Family and friends can play a crucial role in recognizing abnormal symptoms and encouraging medical consultation. However, when menstrual issues are not discussed, women miss out on the opportunity to receive advice, support, and validation from their immediate social circles. This isolation can lead to delays in seeking medical help, as women may not realize that their experiences are not normal or may feel that they do not have anyone to turn to for support. 

2.3. Workplace Stigma and Discrimination 

Many workplaces do not have policies that accommodate the menstrual health needs of their employees, which perpetuates the stigma surrounding menstrual health. This lack of support can lead to significant challenges for women suffering from endometriosis. For instance, the absence of flexible working hours, limited access to rest periods, and inadequate sick leave policies can exacerbate the physical and emotional strain on women dealing with chronic pain and other debilitating symptoms of endometriosis. 

• According to Financial Services Union figures, 49% of women are uncomfortable discussing menstrual health issues at work, with 69% citing discomfort due to the gender of their manager. This can create a culture of silence and shame. 

2.3.1. Fear of Discrimination  

Women with endometriosis often fear discrimination or being perceived as unable to perform their job duties if they disclose their menstrual health condition to employers or colleagues. This fear stems from the stigma surrounding menstruation and women’s health issues in general. Women may worry about being viewed as less capable or unreliable if they need menstrual accommodations like flexible hours or sick leave. As a result, they hide their painful symptoms and do not seek the medical care needed for a timely diagnosis. 

2.3.2. Lack of Supportive Policies  

Many workplaces lack policies that accommodate the menstrual health needs of employees with conditions like endometriosis. Without access to flexible schedules, adequate sick leave, or rest periods, women struggle to manage debilitating symptoms like chronic pelvic pain. This lack of support exacerbates the physical and emotional strain, making it difficult to prioritize seeking a diagnosis. 

2.3.3. Impact on Career Advancement  

The need for frequent sick days, reduced ability to participate in work activities, and overall impact of chronic pain on job performance can hinder career growth for women with endometriosis. They may be passed over for promotions or important projects due to menstrual health issues. This reinforces the cycle of discrimination and inequality, further discouraging them from disclosing their condition and seeking proper diagnosis and care. 

2.4. Limited Representation in Media and Public Discourse 

Topics about menstrual health are not shown or discussed much in TV, movies, news and popular culture. When periods are mentioned, it is often in an insensitive or dismissive way. This lack of accurate and open representation in media and public conversations helps continue the shame and silence around menstrual experiences. Women do not see their menstrual health issues being talked about in a serious, understanding way. This makes many women feel they cannot speak up about their own experiences with painful periods or conditions like endometriosis. The limited and stigmatized portrayal reinforces the idea that these issues should be kept private and not discussed openly. 

By moving towards more honest, inclusive, and educational period advertising that doesn’t stigmatize menstruation as something shameful and secret, brands can play a role in raising public awareness about abnormal period symptoms that may indicate endometriosis. This increased openness and knowledge can potentially lead more women to seek medical care sooner for concerning menstrual issues. 

3. Lack of Education and Awareness 

Endometriosis remains a widely misunderstood and under-recognized condition, both among the public and within the medical community. This lack of comprehensive education and awareness perpetuates delayed diagnosis and inadequate care for those suffering from the condition. 

3.1. Public Awareness Deficit 

Most people do not know much about endometriosis, what symptoms it causes, and how common it is. Because there is little public awareness and information about this condition, many women do not realize that their painful period symptoms could be signs of endometriosis. With this lack of knowledge, women think their severe cramps and other menstrual issues are just normal. They do not understand that the symptoms they are experiencing may be due to a medical problem that requires treatment.  

• This Polish study found that while 84% of women had heard of endometriosis, only 1/3 considered their knowledge sufficient or good. 16.1% had never heard of the condition at all. 

• According to Endometriosis UK, 45% of women are unable to name any symptoms of endometriosis. Additionally, 62% of women aged 16-24 don’t know what endometriosis is. 

This deficit in public awareness about endometriosis delays women from recognizing there may be an underlying health condition. As a result, they do not seek medical help and a diagnosis right away when symptoms first appear. 

3.2. Inadequate Education in Schools 

Schools do not provide enough education about menstrual health and conditions like endometriosis. This important information is often left out of what students are taught. Because they do not learn about menstrual health issues in school, many young women do not know what is considered normal period symptoms versus signs of a potential problem. Without this knowledge from an early age, it is difficult for women to recognize if their painful cramps or heavy bleeding could be symptoms of endometriosis or another condition. They also do not learn how to speak up about menstrual health concerns and advocate for themselves with doctors when experiencing issues. The lack of comprehensive menstrual education in schools leaves many women unprepared to identify abnormal period experiences and get the medical care they need in a timely manner. 

3.4. Limited Healthcare Provider Training 

Many healthcare providers, including primary care physicians and general practitioners, do not get much training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of endometriosis. They lack knowledge about this condition. Because of this gap in their medical training, these doctors may: 

• Misdiagnose endometriosis as something else 

• Dismiss the patient’s painful symptoms as normal period cramps 

• Delay sending the patient to a specialist who can properly diagnose endometriosis 

This makes it take longer for patients to get the right diagnosis and start treatment for their endometriosis. 

• This study found that only 36% of general practitioners “often” or “always” considered endometriosis when faced with typical symptoms. Additional training in gynecology, more common among female GPs aged 40-59, improved their ability to recognize potential endometriosis. 

• A survey of 100 general practitioners in the Seine Maritime region of France revealed significant gaps in their ability to properly diagnose and manage endometriosis. While 44% performed regular gynecological consultations, 63% felt ill-equipped for endometriosis cases. Notably, 50% could not identify the main symptoms. 

Even some gynecologists and other specialists don’t get enough continuing education on the latest updates about diagnosing and treating endometriosis after completing their initial medical training. Without this ongoing education, some specialists may rely on outdated or incomplete information about endometriosis. This can lead to suboptimal care for patients suffering from this condition. 

The lack of comprehensive endometriosis training for many healthcare providers is a major reason why diagnosis is frequently delayed for years after patients first develop symptoms.  

4. Gender Bias in Healthcare 

There are cultural ideas that women’s pain and health issues are not as important or serious as men’s. This bias influences how doctors view and treat women’s pain. When women report severe menstrual cramps or pelvic pain, their knowledge and experiences are often dismissed or invalidated by medical professionals. Doctors don’t take their pain seriously. This systemic bias against women’s reports of pain in the medical field leads to prolonged suffering for those with endometriosis before they get properly diagnosed and treated. 

Age and ethnicity also play a role: 

• Younger women’s symptoms are more likely to be dismissed by doctors because of their age. But women between 40-49 years old tend to get diagnosed faster. 

• For women of different ethnic backgrounds, biases, stereotypes about pain tolerance, and communication barriers can delay them from being referred to a specialist for evaluation. 

The cultural ideology that devalues women’s experiences of pain perpetuates long diagnostic delays and inadequate care for those suffering from endometriosis. Their symptoms are systematically downplayed or not taken seriously by medical providers. 

4.1. Normalization of Women’s Pain 

Numerous studies have documented a concerning trend in which women’s reports of pain and discomfort are frequently taken less seriously or attributed to emotional or psychological factors rather than physical causes. 

This normalization of women’s pains as exaggerated or psychosomatic can lead healthcare providers to overlook or dismiss the very real and debilitating symptoms of endometriosis. 

4.2. Paternalistic Attitudes and Implicit Biases 

Some healthcare providers may unconsciously harbor paternalistic attitudes or implicit biases that diminish the credibility of women’s self-reported experiences. 

This can manifest as a tendency to discount or rationalize away women’s descriptions of their symptoms, leading to delayed investigations or misdiagnoses. 

4.3. Lack of Gender-Specific Research and Training 

Historically, medical research has often focused disproportionately on male subjects, leading to gaps in understanding gender-specific conditions and experiences. 

This lack of comprehensive, gender-specific training can contribute to healthcare providers being ill-equipped to recognize and properly diagnose conditions like endometriosis. 

4.4. Systemic Barriers and Discrimination 

Women, particularly those from marginalized communities, may face additional systemic barriers and discrimination within the healthcare system, further compounding the challenges of receiving an accurate and timely diagnosis. 

Addressing these deeply ingrained gender biases requires a multifaceted approach, including comprehensive education and training for healthcare providers, increased representation and inclusion in medical research, and a concerted effort to challenge and dismantle discriminatory practices and attitudes within the healthcare system. 

5. Historical Context of Endometriosis 

Endometriosis was historically labeled as the “career woman’s disease,” a term that emerged in the mid-20th century when societal norms dictated that women should prioritize childbearing and domestic roles over careers. This label implied that women who delayed motherhood or chose not to have children to pursue professional ambitions were more likely to develop the condition, suggesting they were “punished” for deviating from traditional gender roles. 

This stereotype heavily influenced the perception and treatment of endometriosis. Healthcare providers, swayed by societal norms, often viewed it as a condition mainly affecting professional women who postponed motherhood. This bias led to diagnostic delays, particularly for those who did not fit this profile, such as young women, women of color, or those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. 

Despite advancements in medical knowledge, the stereotype persists, affecting the timely diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis today. Women who do not match the outdated profile may still experience delays because their symptoms are not immediately associated with the condition. Additionally, this stereotype has limited research on endometriosis in diverse populations, leaving gaps in understanding and treatment across different demographics. 

6. Access Barriers 

Even when women recognize the need to seek medical attention for their symptoms, various access barriers can significantly impede their ability to receive a timely and accurate diagnosis of endometriosis. 

6.1. Geographic Disparities 

Access to specialized gynecological care is often limited to rural and remote areas, where there may be a shortage of qualified specialists or advanced medical facilities. 

Women living in these areas may face lengthy wait times or the need to travel long distances to receive appropriate evaluation and diagnosis, delaying the process. 

6.2. Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities 

Cultural biases and stereotypes have led to significant diagnostic disparities among women of color and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The prevailing stereotype that endometriosis predominantly affects White, middle-class women has resulted in women of color and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds being less likely to receive prompt diagnoses. These groups often face additional challenges due to preconceived notions about who is likely to develop endometriosis. 

Women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds encounter compounded difficulties in accessing specialized care. Factors such as lack of transportation, inability to take time off work, and limited access to healthcare information and resources further hinder their ability to seek timely medical attention. These systemic barriers contribute to prolonged delays in diagnosis and treatment, exacerbating the physical and emotional burden of endometriosis. 

6.3. Healthcare Workforce Shortages 

In many areas, there is a shortage of healthcare providers, including gynecologists and other specialists trained in diagnosing and treating endometriosis. This shortage severely limits patients’ access to the necessary expertise, delaying their ability to receive a timely and accurate diagnosis. 

Due to the limited number of specialists, patients often experience extended wait times for appointments and diagnostic procedures. This delay is especially detrimental for endometriosis patients, as the condition can significantly impact their quality of life and requires timely intervention to manage symptoms effectively. The longer patients wait to see a specialist, the longer they suffer from untreated pain and other symptoms. 

6.4. Insurance Coverage and Financial Constraints 

6.4.1. High Costs of Diagnostic Procedures 

Diagnostic procedures for endometriosis, such as laparoscopic surgery, are often expensive. These procedures are considered the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis but involve significant costs due to the surgical nature and the need for specialized equipment and expertise.  

6.4.2. Limited Insurance Coverage 

Many insurance plans provide limited coverage for these procedures or require high out-of-pocket expenses. This can include high deductibles, co-pays, or exclusions for specific types of diagnostic tests. Consequently, even those with insurance may face substantial financial burdens when seeking a diagnosis for endometriosis.  

6.4.3. Barriers for Uninsured and Underinsured Women 

For women without adequate insurance coverage or those who are underinsured, the financial barriers are even more pronounced. The high costs associated with diagnostic procedures can deter these women from pursuing necessary medical tests. They may avoid seeking medical help due to the anticipated expenses, leading to delayed diagnosis and prolonged suffering. 

6.4.4. Impact on Access to Care 

Financial constraints significantly impact access to care. Women who cannot afford the costs associated with diagnosing endometriosis may experience prolonged periods of untreated pain and other symptoms. This lack of access exacerbates their condition, potentially leading to more severe health issues over time. 

6.4.5. Psychological and Emotional Strain 

The financial burden of seeking a diagnosis can also contribute to psychological and emotional strain. Women may experience stress and anxiety related to their inability to afford necessary medical care, further impacting their overall well-being. The added financial pressure can also strain relationships and reduce overall quality of life. 

MARCH Health 

MARCH Health is an innovative healthcare organization dedicated to transforming the landscape of women’s healthcare, with a focus on addressing endometriosis complexities. Their approach is centered around the Onion-Layer model, a multi-faceted system designed to offer escalating levels of personalized care tailored to individual needs. 

At the core of MARCH Health’s mission is a commitment to providing comprehensive and holistic support for women’s health issues, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their healthcare needs. While endometriosis is a primary area of focus, MARCH Health extends its services to encompass all aspects of women’s health, ensuring that every woman receives the support and empowerment she deserves throughout her healthcare journey. 

MARCH Health has developed innovative diagnostic tools and resources aimed at early detection, personalized care, and effective treatment for women with endometriosis. Their approach is rooted in innovation, driven by a deep understanding of the unique challenges faced by women in their healthcare journeys, and guided by cutting-edge technology, evidence-based practices, and a commitment to patient-centered care. 

One of MARCH Health’s key offerings is a mobile app designed specifically for women with endometriosis. This app allows users to track their menstrual cycles, pain levels, and other symptoms associated with the condition, enabling better communication with healthcare providers and informed decision-making about treatment and management strategies. 

MARCH Health recognizes the significant impact of endometriosis on mental health and quality of life, and their approach incorporates various lifestyle interventions and non-pharmacological therapies to promote comprehensive pain management and overall well-being for women with the condition. 

By prioritizing endometriosis while simultaneously addressing the broader needs of women’s health, MARCH Health aims to set a new standard of excellence in women’s healthcare, empowering women to take control of their health and live their lives to the fullest. 

How can MARCH Health help? 

MARCH Health can help shorten the diagnostic delay for endometriosis by addressing several key factors contributing to the problem: 

Combating Normalization and Stigma 

MARCH Health’s comprehensive approach includes raising awareness and providing education to combat the dangerous normalization of menstrual pain and the stigma surrounding menstrual health discussions. By empowering women with accurate information and creating a supportive environment, they can recognize abnormal symptoms and feel encouraged to seek medical attention without shame or hesitation. 

Improving Healthcare Access 

MARCH Health’s innovative Onion-Layer model aims to provide escalating levels of care tailored to individual needs, potentially addressing geographic disparities and healthcare workforce shortages that can delay endometriosis diagnosis. Their commitment to personalized care and leveraging technology can help overcome socioeconomic barriers and ensure equitable access to diagnostic procedures. 

Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication 

MARCH Health’s mobile app and symptom tracking tools can facilitate better communication between patients and healthcare providers. By enabling women to accurately document their symptoms, including those specific to endometriosis, healthcare providers can gain valuable insights and make more informed diagnostic decisions, potentially reducing dismissive attitudes and gender biases. 

Promoting Comprehensive Education 

MARCH Health recognizes the importance of education for both patients and healthcare professionals. Their resources and training initiatives can help raise awareness about endometriosis among the public and provide healthcare providers with up-to-date knowledge and skills for recognizing and diagnosing the condition promptly. 

Addressing Gender Biases in Healthcare 

MARCH Health’s commitment to advancing women’s healthcare and challenging discriminatory practices aligns with the need to address gender biases that contribute to the normalization of women’s pain and delayed endometriosis diagnosis. Their patient-centered approach and focus on empowerment can help counteract paternalistic attitudes and implicit biases within the healthcare system. 

By tackling these multifaceted factors through their innovative model, comprehensive education efforts, and patient-centric approach, MARCH Health has the potential to significantly shorten the diagnostic delay for endometriosis and improve the overall healthcare experience for women suffering from this debilitating condition. 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, MARCH Health’s comprehensive and innovative approach can significantly shorten the diagnostic delay for endometriosis by addressing the multifaceted social factors that contribute to this persistent issue. By combating the normalization of menstrual pain, destigmatizing open discussions about menstrual health, promoting comprehensive education for patients and healthcare providers, and actively challenging gender biases within the healthcare system, MARCH Health is paving the way for a transformative shift in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. 

Through their patient-centric Onion-Layer model, MARCH Health aims to overcome geographic and socioeconomic barriers, ensuring equitable access to diagnostic procedures and personalized care tailored to individual needs. Their innovative mobile app and symptom tracking tools empower women to accurately document their experiences, facilitating better communication with healthcare providers and enabling more informed diagnostic decisions. 

Moreover, MARCH Health’s commitment to advancing women’s healthcare and challenging discriminatory practices aligns with the urgent need to address the deeply ingrained gender biases that contribute to the normalization of women’s pain and delayed diagnosis of endometriosis. By promoting a culture of empowerment and patient-centered care, MARCH Health can counteract paternalistic attitudes and implicit biases within the healthcare system. 

Ultimately, MARCH Health’s multifaceted approach, rooted in innovation, evidence-based practices, and a deep understanding of the unique challenges faced by women in their healthcare journeys, represents a significant step towards improving the overall healthcare experience for women suffering from endometriosis. By addressing the social factors that have perpetuated diagnostic delays for far too long, MARCH Health is paving the way for a future where women’s menstrual health is prioritized, their voices are heard, and their pain is taken seriously, leading to timely diagnosis and effective management of this debilitating condition. 

Reference 

1. Drinkell, Kimberly & Fajzel, Hannah & Tordon, Kiera. (2023). Patient and Practitioner: The Impact of Social Factors on Diagnostic Delay for Endometriosis. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal. 7. 1-11. 10.26685/urncst.450. 

2. Davenport, S., Smith, D., & Green, D. J. (2023). Barriers to a Timely Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Obstetrics and gynecology, 142(3), 571–583. 

3. https://theconversation.com/endometriosis-takes-almost-a-decade-to-be-diagnosed-in-the-uk-our-research-has-revealed-some-of-the-reasons-why-220179 

4. https://www.healio.com/news/womens-health-ob-gyn/20240419/qa-delays-in-endometriosis-diagnosis-treatment-multifactorial 

5. Ballard, K., Lowton, K., & Wright, J. (2006). What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertility and sterility, 86(5), 1296–1301.  

6. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/why-does-receiving-diagnosis-endometriosis-take-so-long 

7. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1590&context=cgu_etd 

8. Culley, L., Law, C., Hudson, N., Denny, E., Mitchell, H., Baumgarten, M., & Raine-Fenning, N. (2013). The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Human reproduction update, 19(6), 625–639.  

9. Cromeens, M. G., Carey, E. T., Robinson, W. R., Knafl, K., & Thoyre, S. (2021). Timing, delays and pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open, 11(6), e049390. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049390 

10. Fryer, J., Mason-Jones, A. J., & Woodward, A. (2024). Understanding diagnostic delay for endometriosis: A scoping review. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.08.24300988 

11. Ducarme, G., Planche, L., & Lebœuf, A. (2021). Repérage et prise en charge de l’endométriose en soins primaires par les médecins généralistes [Screening and management of endometriosis by primary care physicians]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie, 49(9), 672–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.01.011 

12. Quibel, A., Puscasiu, L., Marpeau, L., & Roman, H. (2013). Les médecins traitants devant le défi du dépistage et de la prise en charge de l’endométriose : résultats d’une enquête [General practitioners and the challenge of endometriosis screening and care: results of a survey]. Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite, 41(6), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.02.024 

13. Szymańska, J., & Dąbrowska-Galas, M. (2021). An assessment of Polish women’s level of knowledge about endometriosis: a pilot study. BMC women’s health, 21(1), 404. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01556-2 

14. https://www.endometriosis-uk.org/endometriosis-awareness-month-2020-launches-tackle-fact-54-dont-know-about-endometriosis 

15. Ellis, K., Munro, D., & Wood, R. (2022). The experiences of endometriosis patients with diagnosis and treatment in New Zealand. Frontiers in global women’s health, 3, 991045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.991045 

16. Ellis, K., Munro, D., & Wood, R. (2023). Dismissal informs the priorities of endometriosis patients in New Zealand. Frontiers in medicine, 10, 1185769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1185769